Harvard vs. Trump: International Student Enrollment Revoked by DHS

In a move that has sent shockwaves through academia and diplomatic circles, the Trump administration has revoked Harvard University’s certification to host international students, forcing one of the world’s most prestigious institutions into an unprecedented confrontation with federal authority. The controversial order, which threatens the legal status of over 6,700 international students, has drawn sharp criticism from education leaders, legal experts, and human rights advocates across the globe.

The development, labeled by critics as a calculated escalation in Donald Trump’s broader campus crackdown, is part of a new pressure campaign targeting universities perceived as dissenting against the administration’s policies, particularly those expressing solidarity with Palestine in the aftermath of the Israel-Hamas conflict.

DHS Accusations: A Harsh Letter and Stiff Conditions

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS), in a letter dated May 22, revoked Harvard’s Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP) certification. The letter cited the university’s alleged failure to ensure a “safe” environment for Jewish students, claims of harboring “pro-Hamas sympathies,” and enforcement of “racial” diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies.

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem further intensified the rhetoric by accusing Harvard of “coordinating with the Chinese Communist Party on its campus.” In her online statement, Noem declared, “It is a privilege, not a right, for universities to enroll foreign students.”

The DHS outlined six rigorous conditions Harvard must fulfill within 72 hours to regain its certification, including turning over surveillance footage and records of any alleged unlawful or protest activity by non-immigrant students over the past five years.

The Impact on Harvard and Its Global Community

With 27.2% of its student body comprising international students from over 140 countries, Harvard University stands deeply impacted by the order. The sudden revocation of SEVP certification halts the issuance of the I-20 forms necessary for incoming international students to apply for visas—essentially shutting Harvard’s doors to the world’s brightest minds.

In a statement released on its official website, Harvard emphasized its unwavering commitment to its international community:
“Harvard is committed to maintaining our ability to host our international students and scholars, who enrich the University and this nation.”

The university has since filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration, citing the “immediate and devastating effect” of the move on both the institution and the affected students. A federal judge has already stepped in to temporarily block aspects of the visa revocation, offering a glimmer of hope to students on the brink of displacement.

Students in Limbo: A Legal and Emotional Quagmire

The immediate future of international students at Harvard remains clouded in uncertainty. Those graduating this semester may receive a grace period, but for thousands still pursuing their education, options are rapidly narrowing. While students may attempt to transfer to another SEVP-certified institution, each transfer is subject to tight deadlines and complex immigration hurdles.

Moreover, without valid I-20 documents, international students risk falling out of legal status, facing deportation and losing years of academic progress. The psychological toll of the situation is mounting, with students navigating both academic pressure and geopolitical instability.

Why Harvard? A Political Power Play?

Harvard’s clash with the Trump administration didn’t begin with this letter. The university has been a vocal critic of the administration’s stance on academic freedom, immigration, and civil rights. From resisting curriculum overhauls to rejecting changes in admissions and hiring policies, Harvard has emerged as a symbol of defiance.

In response, the Trump administration has not only stripped federal funding from the university but has also terminated critical research grants. Other Ivy League institutions like Columbia and Princeton have also come under fire, with some capitulating under similar threats.

The underlying message is clear: dissent will be punished, and educational institutions are not beyond the reach of political retribution.

Global Backlash and the Fight for Academic Freedom

The international community is watching closely. Leaders from Canada, India, and the UK have expressed concern, while several global human rights organizations have condemned the move as an attack on academic independence and immigration equity.

Critics accuse the Trump administration of using immigration law as a political weapon to silence opposition and suppress solidarity with marginalized groups. “This is not about campus safety. This is about control,” said one Harvard faculty member, who requested anonymity.

Also Read : “You Are Bharat”: Bansuri Swaraj Empowers UAE Indians in Operation Sindoor Global Outreach